#276 Re: Chris On Screen » Fanboys » 11 Aug 08 :: 04:54

Like I said Deb, I'm just a reporter. I just report what I hear and from where I hear it.

#277 Re: Chris On Screen » Fanboys » 11 Aug 08 :: 04:00

Just FYI here's another site that lists September 19:

http://www.filmjerk.com/earlyreport/art … id_eol=581

Please don't jump on me. Just posting as a journalist. Not getting excited. Dispassionate reporter here. Peace out.

#278 Re: Chris On Screen » Fanboys » 07 Aug 08 :: 17:51

It's on Amazon too but with no price listed:
http://www.amazon.com/Fanboys-Jay-Baruc … 106&sr=1-1

And they use this picture:

0807fanyw8.jpg
0807fanyw8.0d1cf53a62.jpg

#279 Re: Square Eyes » Twilight (contains spoilers for all books and the movies) » 05 Aug 08 :: 00:14

Yes, I saw. I was referring to your comment about "a pre-party at a bar...no wonder the presenters are drunk." That implies the "pre-party" was before the awards, but it wasn't. I was just pointing out that if presenters are drunk it's not because the pre-party was at a bar because the party was the night before, not before the show.

#280 Re: Square Eyes » Twilight (contains spoilers for all books and the movies) » 04 Aug 08 :: 22:58

Sisterdebmac wrote:

Ah, a pre-party at a bar.  No wonder it seems like half the presenters are drunk every year.  And why they joke all night about booze.  Makes sense now.

Hehe. Well, the party was on Saturday. It was called the official "pre-party" although the awards were presented on Sunday night.

Of course, that doesn't exclude the possibility of someone drinking for 24 hours but... tongue

#281 Re: Square Eyes » Twilight (contains spoilers for all books and the movies) » 04 Aug 08 :: 19:00

Michael attended the official pre-party for the Teen Choice Awards on Saturday at Level 3 nightclub in Hollywood.

0802tcskx6.jpg
0802tcskx6.63c4638559.jpg

#282 Re: Chris On Screen » Choose Connor (a.k.a. The Politician) » 04 Aug 08 :: 05:18

BIG news:

Although Strand is primarily known as a DVD distributor, I just got word that Choose Connor will be released theatrically in LA, NY, and DC in October.

Stay tuned for details.

P.S. This came from the writer/director/producer of the film. wink

#283 Re: Chris On Screen » Choose Connor (a.k.a. The Politician) » 03 Aug 08 :: 20:04

I liked it too. I generally despise trailers for being too spoilery and/or including many of the best jokes/dramatic moments in the movie -- understanding, of course, that the idea is to get butts in the seats.

In this case, I feel that they did a good job of avoiding those dilemmas.

There's even a (teeny) moment of Chris's scene in there.

#285 Re: Square Eyes » Twilight (contains spoilers for all books and the movies) » 01 Aug 08 :: 22:45

Didn't see this posted.

Portrait Magazine has announced the results of their annual Top 30 Under 30 poll. Over 100,000 votes were tabulated.

The #1 choice was the cast of Twilight, including Michael.

http://www.portraitmagazine.net/top302008.html

Here are the vote tabulations:

[url]http://vote.sparklit.com/poll.spark?pol … rs=a%3A0%3 A%7B%7D[/url]

#286 Re: Chris On Screen » Choose Connor (a.k.a. The Politician) » 31 Jul 08 :: 19:56

Sisterdebmac wrote:

Awesome, Larry.  Great job.  smile

Thanks so much. smile Besides here, it's up at my 3 blogs, Indie Film Spotlight, 4 IMDb boards, Digg.com, and I sent it out as a MySpace bulletin. It will get picked up by Google Blogs (Indie Film Spotlight) and Google News (Digg).

Unfortunately, I can't really mention Michael (I did post it on his IMDb board), even though it's on his resume and he has two credits at the end, because it will be picked up by all the Twilight sites and he's really not in it at all. It wouldn't be fair to him or them, especially if it is released theatrically.

He will be in the DVD deleted scenes (which I've seen, and they're AWESOME -- he plays a cross-dresser) but that's really not for wide public dissemination yet.

#287 Re: Chris On Screen » Choose Connor (a.k.a. The Politician) » 31 Jul 08 :: 18:43

Here is my story on it, which will go up at 10 locations:

http://www.pronetworks.org/forum/story103222.html

(with Chris mention)

I'm waiting to find out about a theatrical release. Strand is known primarily as a gay-themed DVD distributor but also puts out films theatrically.

#288 Re: Chris On Screen » Chris-Watch: Where and when to catch him on-screen » 31 Jul 08 :: 17:43

Choose Connor has been picked up for distribution. See the Choose Connor thread for more:

http://www.chris-marquette.com/forum/vi … 828#p32828

#289 Re: Chris On Screen » Choose Connor (a.k.a. The Politician) » 31 Jul 08 :: 17:41

Choose Connor has been picked up for North American distribution by Strand Releasing. Here is the blurb from indieWIRE:

North American rights to Luke Eberl's "Choose Connor" have been acquired by Strand Releasing. The film, fresh from Outfest in Los Angeles, is described as a political thriller. It stars Steven Weber and Alex Linx. Making his feature directing debut, Eberl starred as an actor in Tim Burton's "Planet of the Apes" and also had a role in Clint Eastwood's "Letters from Iwo Jima." Jon Gerrans from Strand negotiated the deal with Lev Ginsburg of Hansen, Jacobson, Teller, Hoberman, Newman, Warren & Richman, L.L.P. on behalf of Eberl. "Choose Connor" also screened at the Rome, Woodstock and Cinevegas film festivals. In the film, a Congressman (Weber) meets a teenaged student (Linz) who becomes involved in a web of political intrigue

http://www.indiewire.com/buzz/080727.html#012894

#291 Re: Square Eyes » In Praise of Chris's Colleagues » 29 Jul 08 :: 22:31

magicalturkey wrote:

...or her going up and coming back down too soon?  The latter scares me.

You mean..."and making another movie?" wink

#292 Re: Chris On Screen » Fanboys » 28 Jul 08 :: 21:02

Variety has reviewed Fanboys:

The fans have spoken: In response to pressure from the online community, the cancer subplot prevails in "Fanboys," a raunchy, rough-around-the-edges comedy about five "Star Wars" nuts who fulfill a childhood pact by breaking into Skywalker Ranch for an early look at "Episode I." It's a qualified victory for a project with nearly as many alternate edits as "Blade Runner," since the version set to open in September may satisfy the peanut gallery and preserve director Kyle Newman's vision, but exploits a less-than-solid storytelling device. Still, the resulting publicity should attract a decent geek-centric audience.

Over the course of its topsy-turvy production, "Fanboys" has become as much a cause as an actual film, an offscreen David-vs.-Goliath story pitting a handful of amateur filmmakers against the reshoot-inclined Weinstein Co. End result feels like an uneven cross between an amateur "Project Greenlight" pic and such recent comedies as "Superbad" and "Pineapple Express," in which indie directors brought a certain edge to material that might once have felt more at home under the National Lampoon label.

"Fanboys" fits squarely into the zany road-trip category, briskly introducing the five key characters while setting their Ohio-to-California pilgrimage in motion: Eric (Sam Huntington) doesn't have the nerve to tell his car-dealing dad that he wants to ditch the family business and draw comicbooks; loudmouth Hutch (Dan Fogler) hopes to move out of his mother's carriage house; socially awkward Windows (Jay Baruchel) can't wait to meet an online girlfriend who calls herself "Rogue Leader"; tomboy goddess Zoe (Kristen Bell) can't seem to get her soulmate's attention; and terminally ill Linus (Christopher Marquette) is living with the possibility that he may not be around when "The Phantom Menace" opens.

With Linus' death hanging over their heads, the friends hit the road in Hutch's old van, which he has customized with such features as a nitrous oxide tank (for those unexpected jumps to light speed) and a roof-mounted R2-D2 model. The gang's plan sends them ping-ponging all over the country, first to Iowa, where they pick a fight with a group of "Star Trek" fans led by a barely recognizable Seth Rogen, then south to Austin, Texas, where uber-fanboy Harry Knowles (played by "My Name Is Earl's" Ethan Suplee) roughs them up a bit, then to Vegas to meet a man with blueprints to Skywalker Ranch.

Cameos from such geek idols as William Shatner, Carrie Fisher, Billy Dee Williams and Ray Park spice up the group's adventures, which otherwise lean toward the predictable: mistaking a session with two Sin City escorts for getting lucky, tripping on Native American herb beneath the desert stars and landing in the slammer for trying to outrun a police officer.

Their life-changing trek marks a spiritual journey of sorts, one governed by a form of pop-culture worship in which George Lucas' "Star Wars" mythology serves as the prevailing religion. It's a generational thing, but a tactic that should play well to twenty- and thirtysomethings who define themselves by such touchstones as "Scooby-Doo," "Back to the Future," "Dirty Dancing" and Super Nintendo, all of which are freely referenced here.

Above all else, "Fanboys" remains an enthusiastic attempt to pay tribute to the film that sparked countless fans' love for the movies. Still, Newman and company have stiff competition in this sector: "Fanboys" arrives on the heels of much funnier made-for-TV "Star Wars" homages by "Robot Chicken" and "Family Guy." It helps that Lucas gave the film his blessing, allowing key sound effects to be used (light-saber whooshes accompany the Weinstein Co. logo that opens the film), although bursts of John Williams' score would have gone a lot further than Mark Mothersbaugh's next-best-thing music.

Though not as dirty-minded as, say, Kevin Smith and Jason Mewes, who pop up for a bad-taste bit part here, screenwriters Ernest Cline and Adam Goldberg provide an awful lot of bodily-function humor for a film in which no actual sex takes place.

In the version screened for fans at Comic-Con, said to be the final cut agreed upon for theatrical release, pic is set in motion by the cancer plot device but avoids lingering on sentimental scenes toward the end. Soundtrack contains fewer Rush songs than Hutch's character may have wanted, and things go a little haywire when Danny McBride shows up as Lucas' lead "THX-1138"-costumed security guard, but tech credits are more than adequate despite the relative inexperience of those involved.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117937 … id=31&cs=1

There is also a picture with Chris in it:

rfanboysun4.jpg
rfanboysun4.571f40aa4f.jpg

#293 Re: Square Eyes » In Praise of Chris's Colleagues » 27 Jul 08 :: 01:36

Me has my suspicions about its sources. :devil: Interesting, though.

#295 Re: Chris On Screen » Fanboys » 25 Jul 08 :: 23:33

Samsy-Marie made an ambiguous comment. I simply asked what she meant. Thank you for making it clear.

#296 Re: Square Eyes » Twilight (contains spoilers for all books and the movies) » 25 Jul 08 :: 23:06

Here's my official online birthday greeting to Michael:
http://www.pronetworks.org/forum/story103175.html

I posted it on my 3 blogs, Indie Film Spotlight, IMDb, Digg, and sent it out as a bulletin from my own MySpace. Plus here, of course. big_smile

#297 Re: Chris On Screen » Fanboys » 25 Jul 08 :: 23:02

Sisterdebmac wrote:

Nobody is saying you shouldn't announce it.  I'm sure the fans who post on IMDb will love you for it.  Especially since TWC apparently couldn't care less about issuing an official press release.  Forgive my cynicism, but they earned it on this one.

What on earth leads you to believe that they aren't going to issue an official press release? Obviously there is a gap in the time between when they decide to issue one and when it is released. I happen to have spoken with them during that time period. 

Samsy-Marie wrote:
larry-411 wrote:

I just spoke with The Weinstein Company press office and they have confirmed to me the September 19 date.

That sounds too good to be true.

Again, what sounds to good to be true? That it will actually be released or that they confirmed the date to me?

Why is it so hard to believe that the press office could have given me information in advance of a release being issued?

#298 Re: Chris On Screen » Fanboys » 25 Jul 08 :: 21:55

Sisterdebmac wrote:

This is the key quote from me if you're going to quote me...

I simply do not trust TWC with this movie anymore.

OK?

Privately, I agree 100%. Publicly, though, as a journalist, I have to announce it as an official release date.

From where I sit, you can also replace "TWC" with "Senator" about Mandy Lane. That case is slightly different though because they never announced a release date, ever. Most people think they have, but they never actually did. TWC did before they sold it, but Senator never has.

I would compare this to Alpha Dog. That was a situation where multiple "official" release dates were announced. But each time I still posted them, even though they were cancelled one after another. The fact is, if it turns out to be true, and I didn't post it, I'm left in the dust.

#299 Re: Square Eyes » Twilight (contains spoilers for all books and the movies) » 25 Jul 08 :: 19:41

In honor of Michael's birthday, BellaAndEdward.com has just posted an exclusive interview with him.

http://www.bellaandedward.com/movieinte … ewelch.php

#300 Re: Chris On Screen » Fanboys » 25 Jul 08 :: 19:35

Sisterdebmac wrote:

Call me Fox Mulder.  I want to believe.  But the chunk of salt remains.

I also said I'll believe it when I see that date advertised nationally.  If TeeJay wants to put it on the front page when she gets back from vacation, that's fine.  I, however, am not jumping up and down just yet.  I simply do not trust TWC with this movie anymore.

I don't blame you one bit. You know I've been through this with other movies many many many times over the past few years. But, as a journalist, I can only do what a journalist is supposed to do -- report the facts when they come from a reputable or official source. If I am posting official release dates, as I do all the time, I post it no later than when the distributor gives it to me directly. At that point it's official, whether it ends up coming out on that date or not.

You asked for something official from TWC so I picked up the phone, called the press office, got the confirmation, and posted it for you. Whether or not you want to accept that it's going to come out is one thing. But to say you still don't "believe it" means that you don't trust that I actually called them or talked to the press office. An official statement from the press office is what makes it official, not advertising. It can be weeks before that happens.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB 1.5.11