You are not logged in.
The great thing about films with a big twist, like The Sixth Sense (and Choose Connor) is that they beg seeing it again. Because you have to go back and answer the question, "how did they do that???"
If it's well made enough, you can watch it over and over and still see more each time (Donnie Darko, Jacob's Ladder, The Dangerous Lives of Altar Boys, The Girl Next Door...).
I would also disagree that knowing what the movie is "about" going in ruins it. It might take a bit of the element of surprise out of it, but it doesn't ruin it.
I have to agree since I actually enjoyed the film (or should I say appreciated?) even more when I saw it the second time, even after I knew the "secrets." So it certainly didn't "ruin" the film for me, obviously. Still, I know that the initial impact when seeing it for the first time would have been taken away if I'd known.
To compare it to The Sixth Sense again, I've seen that movie a dozen times and I always see more each time. The same can be said for many other movies with surprises or twists. But, still, there's nothing like that element of discovery when something is revealed in a film the first time you see it. You can never get that feeling back.
I havn't watched all the clips from start to finish yet, due to lack of time i have at the moment, but the one scene i noticed him in is when they are in school and Edward is talking to Bella, and you get a quick shot of Mike watching them before sitting down at a table with a group of others.
I havn't watched the b-roll footage or the interviews, so i don't know if he appears in any of that.
Okay, thanks. That was in one of the official clips posted online too.
Speaking of Paul Dano (and Lou Taylor Pucci)...
Excellent writeup, TeeJay. Now you can see why I haven't written much about the movie.
I knew before I watched the movie that it was about politicians involved in lewd conduct. And somehow I can't shake the feeling that I would have "enjoyed" the movie more if I hadn't known that.
Exactly. That says it all right there. It's like knowing the ending at the start of The Sixth Sense. Once you know that you can never experience the movie and get the impact of it that you would have if you hadn't known it.
So much of the nuance in the movie rests on not knowing that going in. As you said, you focused less on the small things in the relationships between the characters and, to me, that is where the movie truly shines.
Just some feedback on your thoughts:
Holloway's Caleb was supposed to make the viewer very nervous. It was the awkwardness you felt in watching him which Luke actually intended. It's the essence of sexual tension and homoeroticism -- we never quite know what he's about or what he wants. The idea is that it places you in the shoes of Owen -- he isn't sure what anyone's intentions are. Luke holds back and tries to make Connor's and Caleb's advances as subtle as possible. It's not until near the end of the movie when all is revealed.
I don't remember having a problem with the editing but I guess that's something so individual -- it's based on what films you've seen and liked. Technique is pure opinion so I can't argue with that.
One thing Luke talked about extensively at the Q&As was the ending. Yes, he meant it to be somewhat ambiguous. What is Owen running away from? Where is he going? What will he do next? In a Hollywood movie we would have another scene. But he wanted to leave it to the viewer to decide.
The fact that there was no resolution at the end, said to me that you can't stop this sort of conduct in corridors of power. And idealism is seldom rewarded.
You got it 100%. That's precisely what Luke said.
How can he go to the authorities when they, themselves, are part of the deal? And so is the local media. Who could he "tell?" Does he just decide to forget about it?
Or maybe in a few years he decides to write a script about it and make a movie.
It's actually an odd mix. For example, here in the Philadelphia market it's playing at 5 theaters. One is the Ritz at the Bourse, which is part of the Landmark chain. It's your basic arthouse theater. They're also showing The Reader, Revolutionary Road, and The Wrestler, to name a few.
But the other 4 theaters are all multiplexes. A few miles from me it's showing at the Neshaminy 24, which is not only your typical big multiplex but it's the #1 theater in the whole state of Pennsylvania in admissions and box office. You don't get any more plex than that. It's also at AMC Loews Cherry Hill 24, AMC Loews New Brunswick 18, Regal Warrington Crossing 22, and Regal Marketplace 24.
In New York it's also playing large multiplexes. Big screens, big crowds, big theaters.
It's a very very unusual platform. When a film opens so limited (44 screens) it normally plays arthouses almost exclusively. Multiplexes generally book wide releases. So this is a very strange distribution.
Only TWC could pull off something like this because they have the political clout. It's probably part of a package deal: "book this film if you want to book that film."
It's hard to do. I've been playing this game for years. I've long advocated for distributors and theater owners releasing the info in advance but for various reasons they just won't do it. Normally a theater is not allowed to say if they're running a film until the Tuesday before. Even if they run trailers and have posters in the lobby they won't say.
Occasionally the info will leak out, especially if someone who has a connection to a theater owner, projectionist, or other employee. Some theater owners and distribs do announce ahead of time publicly. But it's hit or miss.
For the press, I am on some mailing lists and I get emails and faxes from some distribs and theaters. For example, I have a pretty good relationship with Landmark and usually know their bookings well ahead of time. They booked Fanboys at many theaters and I knew that a couple of months in advance. Some distribs have press sites that I can log onto with a password and get info. But some release no info at all. It's amazing how forthcoming some are while others act like the KGB.
One time there were so many people anxious to know about whether or not a particular film was coming to their area that I begged the producer of the movie to send me the list. He did. But he was so paranoid that people would find out he sent it. Obviously I couldn't reveal my sources. But I wasn't even allowed to post the list. If I did it would probably trace back to him. All I could do was, if someone wanted to know if it was coming to their area, they could tell me where they lived and I could list the theaters just in their area. That was all I was allowed to do.
I have no idea why it's such a closely guarded secret.
Unless someone gets ahold of a list beforehand, theater counts come out on Thursday afternoons so I'll know then.
BTW I checked and a couple of the theaters on that NY list drop out after the weekend.
They have to send more prints out because as one theater ends its run on Thursday night another one starts on Friday and they have to have it in-house a couple of days beforehand.
Usually each theater gets its own print. Theoretically if a theater is ending its run tonight they could send it to one of the theaters starting on the 20th but each theater likes to have a fresh print and not one that's been shown elsewhere since it can get scratched.
I was right. Here are the NY theaters showing it this week and then next week. It goes from 10 theaters to 8. Interestingly, it also loses two but gains two others :
AMC Empire 25
Commack Multiplex Cinemas
AMC Loews Lincoln Square
AMC Loews 34th Street
AMC Loews Raceway 10
AMC Loews Palisades Center 21
AMC Loews New Brunswick 18
Regal Union Square Stadium 14
Regal New Roc City 18 & IMAX
UA Farmingdale Stadium 10
=========
AMC Empire 25
Commack Multiplex Cinemas
AMC Loews Plaza 8
AMC Loews Roosevelt Field 8
AMC Loews New Brunswick 18
Regal Union Square Stadium 14
Regal New Roc City 18 & IMAX
UA Farmingdale Stadium 10
This doesn't have the actual theaters. It might just be a reduction in NY, for example, as opposed to a reduction in markets.
I could look through the individual markets. Do you have the list of NY theaters? It's easy to check those.
According to theater counts just released for the week 2/13-19, Fanboys is dropping 3 theaters, going from 44 to 41.
Total so far is $207,887.
Of films #5-41, it is still the 2nd highest per screen average.
The only way to explain a mid-week increase like this is word-of-mouth.
BTW I have been following, although not posting, the daily box office numbers. Today was a bit of a shocker (although not a huge one). Box office normally declines from Tuesday to Wednesday. Well, Fanboys was the ONLY film of the top 36 films that posted an increase from Tuesday to Wednesday. It wasn't much (5.5%) but it was an increase, nonetheless.
Yup. In fact, chances are they did a trade deal on top of that in order for Comcast to also run ads for Fanboys. That means that TWC gets free advertising in lieu of paying $$, which comes out of the total $$ for the rights to run the features. It was most likely a combo. For example, instead of paying TWC outright $XXX, they may pay $XX and give them $X in ads.
We used to do something like that when I worked on the radio. It would work like this. Instead of Electric Factory Concerts (the promoter) paying us $1,000 to run ads promoting the Bruce Springsteen concert, they would give us $1000 in tickets to give away on the air and we would give them $1000 worth of ads. No money would change hands.
I hate to say it, but it's even possible that the deal included Comcast running ads for other TWC movies and not even Fanboys. That's very common.
In the entire movie or just in the scenes Simon got? In the actual movie... he's in a bunch of scenes at the school and around town. There's one scene when Bella and her father are eating at a diner, Charlie asks her if she's interested in any boys in town, she says no so he asks about "that Newton kid"... just as Mike shoves his butt up against the window and does a little dance on the catwalk.
No, I saw the movie. I meant in whatever Simon got.
It's just an exclusivity deal that allows Comcast sole access to and broadcast rights to the material (trailers, features, etc.). It's similar to deals that Apple, MSN, Yahoo, AOL, etc. cut when they have first rights to a trailer, song, etc.
It works like this. Let's say you want to bring lots of traffic to your site. The best way to do that is to have some sort of exclusive deal with a film. On the one hand, it's a win/win because both sides benefit. On the other hand, it's really more in your interest than theirs since they can put their material anywhere. So they sell the rights to the highest bidder. In this case, that would be you. So you would pay them to allow you to have exclusive rights to post the material.
It's essentially no different than when NBC pays the NFL for the exclusive rights to broadcast certain football games, or when HBO pays Paramount to have them be the only cable network allowed to broadcast their movies.
My understanding (inside info lol) is that TWC got quite a nice bit of $$$ for the Comcast deal.
How much was he in it? Can you describe the scenes? Thanks! Enquiring minds want to know. ![]()
Kyle posted the info himself in various Facebook groups. So it's not like I'm disclosing a secret here.
Yup. Exactly why I knew he didn't have to not mention Kyle.
Just as an FYI about IMDb, in particular (this does not apply to this message board, BTW) --
Pretty much all I do is post info I get from filmmakers, producers, actors, publicists, and others involved with projects. That's pretty much all I've been doing for several years. So I completely understand the politics of information disclosure. Nobody is more sensitive than I as to whether attribution is appropriate or not. Trust me, you make that mistake once and you never do it again! In fact, even if I'm not told not to, I still usually ask if attribution is okay. I would have accepted that guy's non-attribution as appropriate if not for the fact that Kyle had been posting this widely and it wasn't like a private email.
In general, though, I do think it's a good idea not to have the info appear to be coming from the filmmakers themselves. Buzz/viral marketing is all about grassroots. There's some dishonesty to it but you have to decide whether or not the end justifies the means.
Anywhoo...just a little insight into how I operate. If it was me, though, not only would I not have mentioned Kyle but I also would not have said "I have inside info..." That smacks of big ego. I simply would have posted the list of cities and waited for a response.
No importante, though.
(Again, I am mainly referring to IMDb, not here)
RE: Comcast advertising -- they do have the ability to target specific areas. In fact, with Comcast, they can actually target specific neighborhoods, which cannot be done on network TV. Regular TV can only narrow advertising down to broadcast areas, which are usually metropolitan areas. Comcast can send out ads just to a few blocks if they wanted to. So I don't understand why they would advertise in an area where the film isn't even showing, unless it's part of that "we're really advertising the DVD" idea. ![]()
Did anyone post the new cities on IMDb?
Yes, I went right over there and it had gone up 14 minutes earlier. The person who posted it said that "I have solid info that..." as though he had some inside track lol. I would have just said it was an email from Kyle. Oh well, w/e.
Oh well, none of the flvs converted. Odd. The direct link came down as a 70MB file but converted to a 15KB file. The snags off Collider all came in as 15KB flvs. I think there's some sort of encoding/copy protection on them.
larry-411 wrote:and we both chose the same scene. In case someone comes here and hasn't seen it, I'll just say it involves a statue.
Does it include a famous quote that goes "Han Solo is a b...."?
Yup. The scene can't be completely cut because it comes back in the casino. It can be a lot shorter, though. The casino scene was excellent. Much tighter.
TheCentralScrutinizer wrote:The only scene I'd like to see cut shorter was Hutch and the sandwiches. They could cut that out altogetehr and I'd be happy.
Oh yeah, that was a little too gross.
-TeeJay
LOL Definitely pushed the gross-out envelope. There are certainly enough other bodily fluids/functions gags that will satisfy the tween boys.
Larry said that he felt some scenes should have been cut differently
Both my friend and I, after leaving the theater, wrote down on a piece of paper the one scene we felt went far longer than it should have, and we both chose the same scene. In case someone comes here and hasn't seen it, I'll just say it involves a statue.
P.S. I was able to download the flv from the direct link above but it would not convert with YouTube Downloader. I am now using DownloadHelper to snag the vids off the Collider site since that program converts also, so that might work.
I use the Firefox extension DownloadHelper. It snags flv files and converts them to avi in one step. Almost always works.
Occasionally it snags the flv but cannot convert it. In those cases I use YouTube Downloader to convert from flv to wmv. Almost always works.
http://www.downloadhelper.net/
http://youtubedownload.altervista.org/
It's rare that neither one converts the flv.