You are not logged in.
I've been reading up on this SAG president.
What in the world is this entire thing about a lawsuit and an appeal?
Plus there's this bit.
"In other words, the appeal will probably drag on until sometime in November unless Rosenberg et al. are persuaded to drop it. Meanwhile, the suit itself proceeds in the trial court as well. Confused as to how a case can proceed in two courts at once? Well, it happens, and the legal fees aren't cheap. All of this sounds like a campaign issue that Unite for Strength will probably raise—why reelect a president who persists in suing his own union? UPDATE: Indeed, as SAGWatch points out, by continuing to pursue their lawsuit, Rosenberg et al. are reneging on a promise Anne-Marie Johnson publicly made to withdraw the suit if the TV/theatrical contracts were approved."
http://digitalmedialaw.blogspot.com/200 … court.html
I don't know who this guy is, but he seems kind of nuts to sue his own union and costing them money in doing so. Plus this Johnson person reneges on her promise to drop the lawsuit. Sound to me like this president should be kicked out of office.
But wouldn't that mean that 2/3 of them don't?
78% voted in favor of the new contract.
Playmates Wave 2 toys.
New Star Trek Galaxy Collection (3.75") Figures
* McCoy in Enterprise Uniform (B7)
* Chekov in Enterprise Uniform (B15)
* Kirk in Cadet Uniform (B16) [not pictured]
* Kirk in Space Uniform (T1)
* Kirk if Off Duty Uniform (B3)
* Spock in Academy Instructor Uniform (B8)
* Sulu in Space Uniform (B18)
* General Ayel (B14)
* Sarek (B6)
* Keenser (B5 and B12)
* Drakoulias (B17) [Not pictured]
The Warp Collection (6")
* McCoy in Enterprise Uniform
* Chekov in Enterprise Uniform
* Kirk in Cadet Uniform [not pictured]
* Kirk in Space Uniform
* Spock in Academy Instructor Uniform
* Drakoulias [formerly referred to as 'polarilla']
* Hengrauggi [formerly referred to as 'lobster monster']
New Command Series (12") Figures
* Scotty in Enterprise Uniform
* Uhura in Enterprise Uniform
* Nero
[img]http://img.trekmovie.com/images/merchan … copy_t.jpg
Plus Toys R Us will get two exclusives:
* Sulu in Enterprise Uniform
* Pike in Enterprise Uniform
Utility Belt Role Play Set
Sadly no ships in Wave 2. Hopefully in wave 3 in early 2010.
This reminds me of all the talk that eventually dvd and even Blu-Ray will be extinct within just a few years.
Again I don't agree with that at all.
Let's see VCR's came out around 1975. LaserDisc came out around 1977 or so. Both existed very well for close to 20 years or so. LaserDiscs remained a niche market for videophiles.
DVDs came out in 1997. People forcasted the immediate demise of the video-cassette and LaserDisc. While software for those are no longer being produced, I think LD's were stopped being made likely around 2000 or so, videocassettes were being made well into the mid-2000's. VCR's are still available, all though usually as a built-in VCR/DVD Player combo. Even LaserDisc players were still being made until last year I believe.
The point is that even though new technology comes along, the old technology will still be around for years to come.
Blu-Ray came out in 2003. And again some thought it would spell the demise of standard DVD's. Even after 6 years, Blu-Ray is still somewhat of a niche market even today.
Now of course some are saying the all pre-recorded media will meet it's demise soon. I don't agree at all. It may replace the standard rental method, but not replace sold product. Perhaps for bare-bones releases and for those that don't care for extras. But until they have someway of producing all the extras found on dvd/Blu-Ray such as audio commentaries, featurettes, deleted scenes, trailers and other features then I don't think it'll ever replace the dvd/Blu-Ray.
Plus how about printing the disc artwork or the dvd case artwork? Yes people can do that, but not everyone has that capability or has the know-how.
Like I posted above, perhaps dvd download will replace rental and bare-bones dvds, but at present it can't replace the Deluxe/Special Editions with all of the extras.
Well at least as I know.
Sure, some people maybe left behind. But perhaps some of them don't care either. Even today there are people who don't own a tv, a computer, a cell-phone or other electronic gadgets.
Plus I wonder in today's worldwide economy how many people actually have much disposable income left if at all.
Like me, I don't own an MP3 player, an I-Pod, a GPS, a Blu-Ray player or a HDTV. I can live without an MP3 player - I would rather own a cd, an I-Pod, or a GPS -which maybe useful but I don't need or want it.
About the only two things I want is a Blu-Ray player and a HDTV, but both I can live without for awhile.
Well until every single household has "super-high speed" internet then regular tv is safe. And that is very likely never going to happen.
There are likely thousands, perhaps even millions of people that still access the internet via dial-up modem.
Look at the number of people that were unprepared for the switch to digital tv even though they have months of advance notice.
Now will tv have to adapt? Sure. But the demise of tv isn't going to happen any time soon. It'll likely be decades down the road at the earliest.
I could see a day down the road when all networks are gone and people will be able to call up any show and watch it at anytime they want.
I have cable internet and it's still rather slow. I try to download video clips in the 150MB range and it takes upwards of an hour to download. And then sometimes just a minute shy of completion it just stops without any reason.
When I was able to view videos on Youtube and the like, the video & audio would sometimes be out of sync. Or it wouldn't load all the way.
My point is that they will have to vastly improve the speed of the internet before TV via the internet is really viable. Nobody would really have the patience to wait hours before they can watch something when they can just watch it immediately on regular tv.
I never really understood the desire to watch tv or movies on a small computer monitor. It's just too damn small. Like do I really want to watch a Youtube clip of someone falling down or doing some stupid stunt for 15 seconds or some movie split up into 20 clips or do I want to watch it on my regular TV?
Until the day when the computer/TV is all one unit and we have really super high speed internet that is 100% error free that allows immediate downloading of a tv show that is visible on a regular tv then no I don't think tv or cable tv is going to go away.
I do know that I don't record any TV shows anymore. I am just sick of all of those animated people at the bottom of the screen during the show, the elimination of the traditional end credits in favor of text based credits, the ads for junk that's on just a few seconds later, the stupid animated channel logos and the yapping of some announcer telling me what's on in the future or the local news saying what's on the news less than a minute later. I wonder if they do it just so people go out and buy the dvd on the show.
.
I think they were hinting at that it's wrong for him to be in love with an underage girl regardless of what his outside age appears to be.
I only like three vampire movies.
1. The original Dracula
2. Bram Stoker's Dracula
3. Interview with the Vampire
I've read some comments on this movie and I'll paraphrase what they brought up.
1. If a vampire is hundreds of years old, how come he can keep up with all the terms, slang and music that modern day teenagers are into? Wouldn't he be into old classical music and have zero knowledge of what terms/slang that teens are using today. It would be kind of like when a parent tries to be hip with their kids and dress up like a teen and try to use their slang, but sticks out like a sore thumb and is laughed at.
2. If a vampire is hundreds of years old, then why is he lusting after a high school kid? Even though he may look like a teen, he really is very old, so wouldn't he at least be interested in someone in college or something, instead of a kid?
Just wanted to see what your guys reactions are to what I read on another board.
My own question is, what is so appealing about vampire movies in general?
Personally I find most of them rather dull and really never understood how the women in the movie get all gushy over someone who wants to such their blood (even when warned).
Just got this for just $5 at a garage sale this morning. Terrific deal.
$2 From a church rummage sale
Bought these this week.
From the new $4 display.
Here is a review of TWOK Blu-Ray in which they post examples of the differences in picture quality between the two.
Notice how dark the bridge scene is compared to the standard dvd, or the Kirk in shuttle scene where you can barely see the door behind him.
I have seen some comparisons of the dvd and the blu-rays and in some cases the dvd looks much better. In some scenes the Blu-Ray looks too dark, too the point where it's hard to make out anything in the scene.
Trekmovie.com is reporting that Star Trek may indeed be released in October 27th. there will be 3 versions:
Basic Version DVD: just your basic Widescreen version.
2-Disc DVD (possibilty Directors or Special Edition): This is must get if you have DVD because of Disc-2 Features.
Blu-Ray 2-Disc Edition: this is a must out of all of them.
also Trekmovie is reporting that Generations-Nemesis will be released on Blu-Ray on the same date, October 27th.
.
.
Well, it officially bombed at the box office with an opening weekend of $19.5M.
It'll be lucky if it makes $70M domestically.
I was concerned from the beginning with Will being cast and the elimination of the family being stuck in the 'Land of the Lost'. I think instead of going with the comedy route they should have went with a more serious take of the idea.
I think they just changed the concept too much to please fans of the show and others simply didn't even remember the show to begin with. So the potential audience was limited right off the bat.
Anyways, I'll probably check it out on dvd when it's released.
.
Emile Hirsch to star in 'Hamlet'
I thought we might expand this into hoaxes/conspiracy theories as well.
1. JFK assassination: I think Oswald was a scapegoat. Perhaps he had something to do with it, but he wasn't alone.
2. Moon landing: I don't think we ever landed on the moon at all. Sure they blasted off, but I think all they did was orbit the Earth. Everything else was filmed on a sound stage. How come in 30+ years the U.S. or no other country has even attempted to go back. Why are we eliminating the space shuttle and going back to something that looks like it came straight from the 1960's?
3. Pearl Harbor: I think the U.S. government knew in advance that it was going to happen and did nothing to stop it as a way to get the U.S. into the war.
4. 9/11: Same thing as Pearl Harbor. The U.S. government knew it was going to happen and allowed it to happen so that Bush could have a reason to go and wage war.
When I was very little I saw a strange little furry creature that ran across the road into a field once. It stood about 3 to 4 feet and was completely covered with hair. I ran into the back yard and continued to see it run through the field and then disappeared into a nearby woods.
Now can I say for a fact that it was bigfoot, no. But it made me a believer in the idea of one.
Regarding ghosts. Now I have seen ghosts a few time in my lifetime. But never has one moved anything, spoke or touched me or anyone that I know.
When something like that happens I think it's the power of the person's mind that is experiencing that. In other words the person is the one that is actually manifesting the events completely through the power of their mind.
Which goes into my theory of demonic possession, that it's the power of the possessed persons mind that is creating these events.
It's just that they are completely unaware that they are doing it.
Like I noted before that I think that ghosts are just past images showing up in current time. Kind of like an imprint. I don't think they are spirits of the dead.
So I also don't believe in spirits at all. I think the entire idea of having a spirit is wishful thinking that this life will continue somehow after our death. I think all we have is our mind and that once we die that everything that we were is gone forever. So we only have one time to get it right and to live a good life.
So obviously I don't believe in reincarnation either.
Since UFO's were brought up I thought it might be interesting to see what things people do or don't believe in.
I think the following do exist.
1. UFO's
2. Aliens
3. Bigfoot
4. Ghosts (But I think they aren't actually spirits, but more like images of the past somehow being seen today)
5. Bermuda Triangle
I don't believe these exist:
1. Loch Ness Monster (Too little food supply to feed it, and too large to not have been found by now)
2. Demonic possessions
3. Chupacabra (or however it's spelled)
4. The Mothman
5. Crop Circles (I think all are man made)
I'm so there are others, but my mind is a blank right now.
Bought these from the $5 Walmart bin.
I bought the Official Souvenir Magazine today. $9.99 for it from Borders.
Some real nice photos included.
Interviews with all the major stars of the film.
I'm really interested in getting the Cinefex magazine that comes out this summer that will cover the visual effects of the film.